Which of the following is a condition for exclusive remedy in workers' compensation claims?

The condition for exclusive remedy in workers' compensation claims relates to the protections provided to employers and the limitations on what employees can claim outside the workers' compensation system. Exclusive remedy states that if the conditions of employment are met, employees cannot sue their employers for workplace injuries or illnesses, and the only compensation for such injuries must come through the workers' compensation system.

Voluntary intoxication is significant because if an employee is injured while intoxicated on the job, they can be denied workers' compensation benefits. This serves as a safeguard for employers and ensures that employees do not abuse the system. In this context, an employee's voluntary intoxication can be a condition under which their right to claim for injuries might be forfeited, supporting the principle of exclusive remedy in the workers' compensation framework.

In contrast, other options do not accurately reflect conditions that invalidate the exclusive remedy provision. Employer fault does not negate exclusive remedy protections; rather, it reinforces them by establishing the limited liability approach of workers' compensation. The use of personal protective equipment is a safety measure and does not directly relate to a denial of benefits under the exclusive remedy rule. Previous work-related injuries do not affect the exclusive remedy principle either, as workers can still claim compensation under the system regardless of past injuries